Comparison · Emergency mass notification

Multilarm vs Alertus: an honest comparison

Emergency notification across desktop takeover, beacons, panels, mobile and existing systems.

Checked against published documentation on

Alertus is the right choice for an organisation whose requirement is emergency notification in its own right — visible, acknowledged, and reaching every device and screen on a campus. Multilarm is the right choice when the requirement is a building's everyday audio, with emergency as its highest-priority case.

This page is written by the makers of one of the two products, so the only version worth publishing is one that is specific about where the other one wins. Every section below names a buyer who should not choose Multilarm.

What Alertus is

Alertus is an emergency mass notification system built around reaching people through whatever they are already looking at: desktop pop-ups, wall-mounted alert beacons, digital signage takeover, mobile push and integration with systems a campus already owns.

It is a campus and enterprise product, bought by safety and security officers rather than facilities teams.

Where Alertus is better

Where Multilarm is better

Side by side

Cells reading “Not published” mean we could not find the answer in Alertus Technologies’s own documentation on 2026-08-30. That is not the same as “no”, and this table will not pretend it is.

CapabilityAlertusMultilarm
Desktop alert takeoverYesNo — planned
Alert beacons and panelsYesNo — a browser display page and a relay output
Panic button initiationYesYes — a physical emergency input and network triggers
Escalation and acknowledgementYesNo — planned
Drill modeYesNo — planned
Everyday scheduled audioNot the productYes — the core
Works with no internetNot published as a supported modeYes
Public alert feed (CAP) ingestionYesYes
Certified life-safety equipmentNo — a notification platformNo — not fire-alarm equipment

Choose Alertus if

Choose Multilarm if

How to check any of this

Multilarm’s own capabilities are published as machine-readable data at features.json, including every feature it does not have and the ones it has deliberately declined to build. Measured performance figures, with the method for each, are on the measured data page. The canonical facts about licensing, offline operation and the fire-alarm boundary are at facts.json. If anything on this page is wrong, say so and it will be corrected.

FAQ

Is emergency notification safe to run on a Raspberry Pi?

For a supplementary voice alert, on a device with signed self-reverting updates and an on-device diagnostics battery, yes. It is not certified life-safety equipment and does not replace a fire alarm — that boundary is published and is not negotiable.

Does Multilarm have a drill mode?

Not yet. It is listed as absent in the feature matrix and is on the roadmap.

Sources

Everything stated here about another product is taken from that vendor's own public documentation on the date shown, and is limited to what they publish about themselves. Products change; if something below is out of date or wrong, tell us and it will be corrected. Where we could not find a published answer the table says so rather than guessing.

Not sure this is the right purchase for your building? Ask a specific question — including whether you should be buying something else.